Over the past five years, there has been a growing trend to implement salary history—or salary discussion—bans. These laws aim to end the cycle of pay inequity experienced by women, minorities, and other underrepresented groups.
Workers who have experienced pay discrimination will continue to do so in potential jobs if the salary offered is based on previous earnings, thus continuing the cycle of discrimination.
Determining compensation for a position is best based on market rate analysis, not what a potential employee has earned in the past. The job requirements may have been different; they may have worked for a smaller company or gained significant experience.
The “salary history” fields on job applications are gradually phasing out—interviewers should not ask potential hires about their previous salaries. This courtesy may also apply to past benefits and other compensation, such as bonuses.
As of now, 27 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and many localities have enacted these bans. Similar legislation is pending elsewhere within the U.S., so if you’re unsure, check your state laws—it’s better to err on the side of caution.
Michigan and Wisconsin have prohibited salary discussion bans. In these states, local governments may not regulate the information employers must request, require, or exclude on an application for employment or during the interview process.
Legislation for Salary discussion bans varies widely. Variations may include any or all of the following:
While these laws initially focused on full-time equivalent hires (FTEs), most pay ban legislation applies to contingent workers. Here are a few tips for ensuring successful employment, hiring, and payrolling practices:
Thanks for checking out our blog; click here to keep reading!
At nextSource, we can offer you the knowledge and expertise in workforce solutions and management to help your business and employees thrive—connect with us today!