Over the years, the Department of Labor (DOL), individual states, and the courts have attempted to establish a clear, unified definition of an independent contractor. While similar, each varies enough to cause employer confusion and increased litigation.
While this is not a quick and easy definition in a dictionary, most definitions are based on the “economic reality” of the relationship between the employer and the individual, considering six, non-exclusive factors:
The DOL continues to be embroiled in a legal challenge regarding its delay of the “IC Final rule”, enacted at the end of President Trump’s term and originally set to go into effect in March 2021. The DOL is now considering the publication of a new Final Rule. However, it would apply only to the analysis under federal law and would not affect how states determine who qualifies as an independent contractor under their statutes. To add to the confusion, a new final rule would not redefine who qualifies as an independent contractor under the Internal Revenue Code, the National Labor Relations Act, or other federal laws.
The growth of gig workers is further complicating the definition. A bill that would introduce a new type of work arrangement – the “Worker Flexibility and Choice Act” – was introduced in the US House of Representatives last month. Modeled after work arrangements in some European locations, it aims to combine the flexibility of independent work while allowing businesses to offer workplace benefits traditionally only available to employees. Similar bills proposed in Massachusetts and California were struck down by the courts as they would effectively eliminate minimum wage and overtime compensation protections.